Avian Medicine: Principles and Application
Impact in
- Parasitology 746
Classified as
- Journal
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w52858232 →Countries where authors are citing Avian Medicine: Principles and Application
This map shows the geographic impact of Avian Medicine: Principles and Application. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Avian Medicine: Principles and Application with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Avian Medicine: Principles and Application more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Avian Medicine: Principles and Application
This network shows the impact of Avian Medicine: Principles and Application. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Avian Medicine: Principles and Application.
About Avian Medicine: Principles and Application
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Branson W. Ritchie, Greg J. Harrison and Linda R. Harrison covering the research area of Infectious Diseases, Animal Science and Zoology and Parasitology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Parasitology (746 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (374 citations), Ecology (332 citations), Small Animals (211 citations) and Microbiology (210 citations). Published in Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w52858232.