Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions
- Authors
- Sung-Hyuk Cha
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5277699 →Countries where authors are citing Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions
This map shows the geographic impact of Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions
This network shows the impact of Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions.
About Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Sung-Hyuk Cha covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (412 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (317 citations) and Signal Processing (166 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5277699.