Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey
- Journal
- Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5219911 →Countries where authors are citing Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey
This map shows the geographic impact of Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey
This network shows the impact of Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey.
About Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey
This paper, published in 2003, received 524 indexed citations . Written by John E. Core, Wayne R. Guay and David F. Larcker covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (485 citations), Strategy and Management (241 citations) and Finance (204 citations). Published in Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5219911.