Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires

551 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 551 indexed citations. Written by Jean J. Schensul, Stephen L. Schensul and Margaret D. LeCompte covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (185 citations), Education (128 citations) and General Health Professions (103 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w52013505 →

Countries where authors are citing Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w52013505.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026