Physiology of the Amphibia

450 indexed citations
published 1964
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w51946813 →

Countries where authors are citing Physiology of the Amphibia

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Physiology of the Amphibia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Physiology of the Amphibia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiology of the Amphibia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Physiology of the Amphibia

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Physiology of the Amphibia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Physiology of the Amphibia.

About Physiology of the Amphibia

This paper, published in 1964, received 450 indexed citations . Written by John A. Moore covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (142 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (105 citations), Ecology (99 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (80 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (76 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w51946813.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact