Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism

637 indexed citations
published 1995
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w51792588 →

Countries where authors are citing Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism.

About Caenorhabditis elegans : modern biological analysis of an organism

This paper, published in 1995, received 637 indexed citations . Written by Henry F. Epstein covering the research area of Aging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Aging (531 citations), Molecular Biology (338 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (135 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w51792588.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026