Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
- Authors
- George Lakoff
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w51251441 →Countries where authors are citing Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
This map shows the geographic impact of Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
This network shows the impact of Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think.
About Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
This paper, published in 1996, received 658 indexed citations . Written by George Lakoff. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (300 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (130 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w51251441.