Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking
- Authors
- Keith Krehbiel
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w51202548 →Countries where authors are citing Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking
This map shows the geographic impact of Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking
This network shows the impact of Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking.
About Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking
This paper, published in 1998, received 350 indexed citations . Written by Keith Krehbiel covering the research area of Law, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (296 citations), Economics and Econometrics (167 citations) and Strategy and Management (118 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w51202548.