Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester.
Impact in
- Immunology 248
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w51195465 →Countries where authors are citing Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester.
This map shows the geographic impact of Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester.
This network shows the impact of Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester..
About Induction of maturation in cultured human monocytic leukemia cells by a phorbol diester.
This paper, published in 1982, received 699 indexed citations . Written by Shigeru Tsuchiya, Yasuko Kobayashi, Yoichi Goto, Shingi Nakae, Tasuke Konno and Keiya Tada covering the research area of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (286 citations), Immunology (248 citations), Oncology (70 citations), Epidemiology (70 citations) and Cancer Research (68 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w51195465.