Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.

504 indexed citations
published 1982

Countries where authors are citing Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots..

About Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots.

This paper, published in 1982, received 504 indexed citations . Written by Paul P. Kormanik and A.-C. McGraw covering the research area of Plant Science and Agronomy and Crop Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (480 citations), Pharmacology (127 citations), Cell Biology (93 citations), Soil Science (81 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (71 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w51146217.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact