Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things
- Authors
- Marilyn Strathern
- Journal
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w51116407 →Countries where authors are citing Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things
This map shows the geographic impact of Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things
This network shows the impact of Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things.
About Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things
This paper, published in 1999, received 402 indexed citations . Written by Marilyn Strathern covering the research area of Anthropology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anthropology (144 citations), Sociology and Political Science (123 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (72 citations). Published in BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w51116407.