2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.

3.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 3.2k indexed citations. Written by Cynthia L. Ogden, Shutao Guo, Laurence M. Grummer‐Strawn, Katherine M. Flegal, Zuguo Mei, Rong Wei and A. Roche covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.8k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (680 citations) and General Health Professions (515 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w50963390 →

Countries where authors are citing 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w50963390.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026