Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers.

4.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 4.0k indexed citations. Written by Trisha L. Bailey and Charles Elkan covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (3.1k citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations) and Genetics (557 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w50854728 →

Countries where authors are citing Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w50854728.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026