Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Kihyuk Sohn, Xinchen Yan and Honglak Lee covering the research area of Developmental Biology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (555 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (527 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (142 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w50734695 →

Countries where authors are citing Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w50734695.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026