Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w50673154 →Countries where authors are citing Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011.
This map shows the geographic impact of Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011.
This network shows the impact of Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011..
About Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011.
This paper, published in 2013, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Ruth Perou, Rebecca H. Bitsko, Stephen J. Blumberg, Patricia N. Pastor, Reem M. Ghandour, Alexander E. Crosby, Susanna N. Visser, Laura A. Schieve, Sharyn E. Parks and Debra J. Brody. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (355 citations), General Health Professions (124 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (116 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w50673154.