The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w50396646 →Countries where authors are citing The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
This map shows the geographic impact of The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
This network shows the impact of The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy..
About The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
This paper, published in 2006, received 657 indexed citations . Written by Mark Kutner, Elizabeth Greenberg, Jin Ye and Christine Paulsen covering the research area of General Health Professions and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (503 citations), Health (96 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (78 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w50396646.