Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030

579 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 579 indexed citations. Written by Pedro L. Alonso, Abdisalan Noor, Ana Carolina Faria e Silva Santelli, Azra C. Ghani, Ciro de Quadros, Corine Karema, Qi Gao, J. Kevin Baird, Lesong Conteh and Margaret Gyapong covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (485 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (130 citations) and Parasitology (70 citations). Published in ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w49983142 →

Countries where authors are citing Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w49983142.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026