Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds

934 indexed citations
published 1965
Authors
John Dyer
Journal
Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w49336487 →

Countries where authors are citing Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds.

About Applications of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds

This paper, published in 1965, received 934 indexed citations . Written by John Dyer. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (358 citations), Materials Chemistry (243 citations), Polymers and Plastics (189 citations), Oncology (126 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (96 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w49336487.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact