Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems

1.8k indexed citations
published 1993
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w48673181 →

Countries where authors are citing Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems.

About Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems

This paper, published in 1993, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Colin R. Reeves covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (730 citations), Artificial Intelligence (390 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (310 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w48673181.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026