Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function
- Authors
- Charles R. CantorPaul Schimmel
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w48601430 →Countries where authors are citing Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function
This map shows the geographic impact of Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function
This network shows the impact of Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function.
About Biophysical Chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function
This paper, published in 1980, received 722 indexed citations . Written by Charles R. Cantor and Paul Schimmel. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (476 citations), Materials Chemistry (116 citations) and Spectroscopy (74 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w48601430.