Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma
- Journal
- Journal of Paleontology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4850832 →Countries where authors are citing Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma
This map shows the geographic impact of Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma
This network shows the impact of Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma.
About Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites-Palaeophycus dilemma
This paper, published in 1982, received 566 indexed citations . Written by S. George Pemberton and Robert W. Frey covering the research area of Earth-Surface Processes, Ecology and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Earth-Surface Processes (490 citations), Atmospheric Science (350 citations) and Paleontology (322 citations). Published in Journal of Paleontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4850832.