Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- J. D. Tygar
- Journal
- USENIX Security Symposium
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w483928 →Countries where authors are citing Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0
This map shows the geographic impact of Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0
This network shows the impact of Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0.
About Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0
This paper, published in 1999, received 669 indexed citations . Written by J. D. Tygar covering the research area of Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (475 citations), Sociology and Political Science (305 citations), Artificial Intelligence (195 citations), Signal Processing (178 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (139 citations). Published in USENIX Security Symposium.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w483928.