Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context
Impact in
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w48347686 →Countries where authors are citing Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context
This map shows the geographic impact of Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context
This network shows the impact of Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context.
About Human Diversity: Perspectives on People in Context
This paper, published in 1994, received 521 indexed citations . Written by Edison J. Trickett, Roderick J. Watts and Dina Birman. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (253 citations), Sociology and Political Science (233 citations), Education (128 citations), General Health Professions (118 citations) and Clinical Psychology (115 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w48347686.