Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research
- Authors
- H. M. Blalock
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w48041408 →Countries where authors are citing Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research
This map shows the geographic impact of Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research
This network shows the impact of Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research.
About Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research
This paper, published in 1964, received 920 indexed citations . Written by H. M. Blalock covering the research area of History and Philosophy of Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (258 citations), Economics and Econometrics (117 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (111 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w48041408.