InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Svend BrinkmannSteinar Kvale
- Journal
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47859060 →Countries where authors are citing InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing
This map shows the geographic impact of InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing
This network shows the impact of InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing.
About InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing
This paper, published in 2015, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Svend Brinkmann and Steinar Kvale covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (411 citations), General Health Professions (362 citations), Education (341 citations), Clinical Psychology (249 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (183 citations). Published in VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47859060.