Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4716269 →Countries where authors are citing Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard
This map shows the geographic impact of Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard
This network shows the impact of Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard.
About Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts : Approved standard
This paper, published in 2008, received 863 indexed citations . Written by John Rex and Clinical covering the research area of Plant Science and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (499 citations), Epidemiology (351 citations) and Organic Chemistry (164 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4716269.