Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.

841 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 841 indexed citations. Written by Bruce A. Dye, Sylvia Tan, Vincent C. Smith, Brenda G. Lewis, Laurie K. Barker, Gina Thornton‐Evans, Paul I. Eke, Eugenio D. Beltrán‐Aguilar, Alice M. Horowitz and Chien-Hsun Li covering the research area of Periodontics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Periodontics (696 citations), General Health Professions (177 citations) and Oral Surgery (138 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w47151317 →

Countries where authors are citing Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w47151317.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026