Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.
- Authors
- Charles Tanford
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47147756 →Countries where authors are citing Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.
This map shows the geographic impact of Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.
This network shows the impact of Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation..
About Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.
This paper, published in 1970, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Charles Tanford covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (1.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (575 citations) and Cell Biology (218 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47147756.