Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature.

669 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1976, received 669 indexed citations. Written by Lawrence P. McAdam, Rodney Bluestone and Carl M. Pearson covering the research area of Rheumatology and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Rheumatology (624 citations), Genetics (534 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (111 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w47084872 →

Countries where authors are citing Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Relapsing polychondritis: prospective study of 23 patients and a review of the literature..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w47084872.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026