Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47024460 →Countries where authors are citing Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
This map shows the geographic impact of Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
This network shows the impact of Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument..
About Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
This paper, published in 1993, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Terry C. Davis, Sandra W. Long, Robert H. Jackson, Edward J. Mayeaux, Ronald B. George, Peggy W. Murphy and Mark Crouch covering the research area of Speech and Hearing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Health (163 citations) and Epidemiology (152 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47024460.