Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management.

329 indexed citations
published 1975
Journal
PubMed

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w47001332 →

Countries where authors are citing Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management..

About Psychological aspects of focal epilepsy and its neurosurgical management.

This paper, published in 1975, received 329 indexed citations . Written by Brenda Milner covering the research area of Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (184 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (65 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w47001332.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026