Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews

629 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 629 indexed citations. Written by Jennie Popay, Helen Roberts, Amanda Sowden, Mark Petticrew, Lisa Arai, Mark Rodgers and Nicky Britten covering the research area of Speech and Hearing, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (212 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (135 citations) and Clinical Psychology (113 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w46984849 →

Countries where authors are citing Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in sytematic reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w46984849.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026