The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks

786 indexed citations
published 2002
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w46910317 →

Countries where authors are citing The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks.

About The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks

This paper, published in 2002, received 786 indexed citations . Written by Zygmunt J. Haas, M.R. Pearlman and Prince Samar covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (774 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (312 citations), Aerospace Engineering (33 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (11 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (9 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w46910317.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026