Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative

850 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1984, received 850 indexed citations. Written by Peter Brooks covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (486 citations), Sociology and Political Science (191 citations) and Philosophy (119 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4667406 →

Countries where authors are citing Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reading for the plot : design and intention in narrative.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4667406.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026