The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w46342658 →Countries where authors are citing The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.
This map shows the geographic impact of The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.
This network shows the impact of The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource..
About The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.
This paper, published in 1999, received 505 indexed citations . Written by Benjamin F. Hankey, Lynn A. G. Ries and B. K. Edwards covering the research area of Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (241 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (127 citations) and Surgery (119 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w46342658.