Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w46338023 →Countries where authors are citing Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review.
This network shows the impact of Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review..
About Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review.
This paper, published in 2004, received 557 indexed citations . Written by Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Erly Catarina de Moura, Wolney Lisbôa Conde and Barry M. Popkin. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (402 citations), General Health Professions (159 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (120 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w46338023.