Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w46125516 →Countries where authors are citing Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework
This map shows the geographic impact of Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework
This network shows the impact of Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework.
About Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Filippo Giorgi, Colin Jones and Ghassem Asrar covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations), Atmospheric Science (968 citations) and Water Science and Technology (197 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w46125516.