Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism.

700 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 700 indexed citations. Written by Christopher J L Murray and David Evans covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (380 citations), Finance (194 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (191 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w46095416 →

Countries where authors are citing Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w46095416.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026