Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use

515 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 515 indexed citations. Written by Paul DiMaggio, Eszter Hargittai and Steven A. Shafer covering the research area of Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Media Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (244 citations), Communication (236 citations) and Media Technology (152 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w46073692 →

Countries where authors are citing Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w46073692.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026