Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model

529 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 529 indexed citations. Written by Bastian Leibe, Aleš Leonardis and Bernt Schiele covering the research area of Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (495 citations), Aerospace Engineering (120 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (98 citations). Published in Max Planck Digital Library.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w46004347 →

Countries where authors are citing Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation With an Implicit Shape Model.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w46004347.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026