ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w45676213 →Countries where authors are citing ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results
This map shows the geographic impact of ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results
This network shows the impact of ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results.
About ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results
This paper, published in 2011, received 432 indexed citations . Written by Akira Iwasaki, Dean B. Gesch, Jeffrey J. Danielson, Bill Curtis, Michael J. Abrams and C. C. Carabajal covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (170 citations), Environmental Engineering (149 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (136 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w45676213.