Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas
- Authors
- Bernard RoyDenis Bouyssou
- Journal
- Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4564446 →Countries where authors are citing Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas
This map shows the geographic impact of Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas
This network shows the impact of Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas.
About Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas
This paper, published in 1993, received 541 indexed citations . Written by Bernard Roy and Denis Bouyssou. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (332 citations), Artificial Intelligence (112 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (93 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (68 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (64 citations). Published in Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4564446.