Framework for ecological risk assessment

409 indexed citations
published 1992
Journal
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w45515159 →

Countries where authors are citing Framework for ecological risk assessment

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Framework for ecological risk assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Framework for ecological risk assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Framework for ecological risk assessment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Framework for ecological risk assessment

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Framework for ecological risk assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Framework for ecological risk assessment.

About Framework for ecological risk assessment

This paper, published in 1992, received 409 indexed citations . Written by Donald J. Rodier and Sue Norton covering the research area of General Materials Science, Water Science and Technology and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (156 citations), Pollution (126 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (77 citations). Published in OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w45515159.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026