Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.

518 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1965, received 518 indexed citations. Written by Michael A. Wallach and Nathan Kogan covering the research area of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (443 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (193 citations) and Social Psychology (106 citations). Published in Swarthmore College Works (Swarthmore College Libraries).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4540885 →

Countries where authors are citing Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4540885.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026