Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w45380570 →Countries where authors are citing Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study
This map shows the geographic impact of Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study
This network shows the impact of Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study.
About Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study
This paper, published in 1986, received 520 indexed citations . Written by Hollis B. Chenery, Sherman Robinson and Moshé Syrquin covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (392 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (279 citations) and Strategy and Management (63 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w45380570.