The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication

441 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1985, received 441 indexed citations. Written by Michael J. Ryan covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Developmental Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (378 citations), Global and Planetary Change (262 citations) and Developmental Biology (217 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w45283153 →

Countries where authors are citing The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w45283153.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026