Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India

407 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1995, received 407 indexed citations. Written by Veena Das covering the research area of Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (206 citations), Political Science and International Relations (119 citations) and Anthropology (108 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w45045377 →

Countries where authors are citing Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w45045377.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026