WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs
Impact in
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4473858 →Countries where authors are citing WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs
This map shows the geographic impact of WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs
This network shows the impact of WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs.
About WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs
This paper, published in 2014, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Robert J. Kurman, Maria Luisa Carcangiu, C. Simon Herrington and Robert H. Young. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Reproductive Medicine (772 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (712 citations), Epidemiology (309 citations), Surgery (305 citations) and Molecular Biology (222 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4473858.