Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle

1.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Steven Klepper covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (1.1k citations), Strategy and Management (669 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (320 citations). Published in American Economic Review.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4409710 →

Countries where authors are citing Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4409710.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026