Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Jonathan M. Chase and Mathew A. Leibold covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (570 citations), Ecology (531 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (429 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w44055853 →

Countries where authors are citing Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w44055853.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026